Between your users in a matchmaking relationship, really was basically students (77

Between your users in a matchmaking relationship, really was basically students (77

89 (SD = 2.27); cuatro.94 (SD = 2.97), each other teams different ranging from 6 months and you will eleven many years of matchmaking; seven.76 (SD = 4.01), ranging from several and you can 19 years; and you will (SD = 4.82), between less than a year and you may 30 age. 8%) and you may stayed with relatives, if you’re those managing the couples have been mostly performing anybody (69.2%), where 53% got college otherwise postgraduate stages. Of certified commitment participants, 67% had university otherwise post-scholar amount, from which 89.8% was working, 2% resigned and 8.2% underemployed. The functional disease for the partnered players is comparable: 89.5% was operating, dos.9% was retired and you will 6.3% was indeed unemployed, and you may 1.3% introduced other a job status. Inside group, 62.5% of your own participants had school otherwise postgraduate values.

Relationship High quality, picked to ensure standards validity, was mentioned on the Matchmaking Rating Setting–Revised (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adjust

The info exhibited was amassed in the framework regarding wide search programs, and therefore contained a detailed sociodemographic and you will dating assessment, along with other bills during the extent regarding romantic matchmaking.

Individual partnership was analyzed according to the Portuguese variation (Dining table step 1) of the less types of the latest Efforts Level (Stanley, 1986), that has been translated with regards to the adopting the translation and you will retroversion steps: after permission was given from the publisher, the first scale was interpreted because of the a few experts in the field, both of these translations were exposed to retroversion by a couple experts, you to definitely bilingual and one proficient in the usage how to use meet-an-inmate the latest English language; in the long run, each variation was than the original level, opting for the employment of brand new conditions and you may issues that have deeper distance in order to it. The fresh new Portuguese variation therefore consisted of the 14 fresh points and you may an equivalent respond to scale and was titled, immediately after deliberation of the cluster, the personal Connection Size (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). Into the finally stage of the interpretation techniques, the new means is actually applied to three users toward goal of confirming this new adequateness of your vocabulary and unambiguous comprehension of the items, which have been chatted about to your players just after applying of the questionnaire. As there was basically no statements stating or even, what exactly remained an identical.

With regards to the complete lifetime of the relationship, the common, in many years, into more statuses explained is, respectively: 2

by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *